Wednesday, October 7, 2009

Food Inc - Hungry for change?

Watched Food Inc. An independent documentary on the American food industry ala Michael Moore with better art direction. The big States seems to be always getting the spotlight for their lead role – the tyrant of all sorts when it comes to consumer scandals (whether or not it’s within their shores). Independent filmmaker Robert Kenner strips away America’s packaging without shame to expose some of the most hideous acts and pure selfish motivations of the country in the name of capitalist growth. It may seem insignificant now, but not in the near future.

Not too long ago, we completed the research on ‘The Green Chronicles’ and have been actively pursuing and propagating sustainability by encouraging people to make the right decisions. Not by going against the system but by actually utilizing the same system these capitalist monsters have been using against gullible human and nature, called consumerism. Yes, you can vote every single day for what you believe in and what is right for your family, community, society, country and ultimately the world by spending your dollar wisely, choosing only manufacturers and service providers that put social business back into commerce. Corporations have always been consumer-centric anyway, but it’s increasingly important for us to acknowledge the importance of being crowd-centric instead. Considering communities as a whole before profit, even before the consumer, I dare say... Simply because being consumer-centric only means profit generation. The problem starts when they get all fuzzied vision about it and forget that they too are living in a society spiraling downwards in this era of environmental doom.

Well, vote responsibly with your money and support local industry (I speak for Malaysia – please understand that a lot of the ‘nice imageries of delicious foods and made-up vitamins’ come from packaging design and really smart brand marketing – take it from someone who is from the advertising industry aight’?), so yea… if the quality isn’t too bad then why not vote for local produce the next time you purchase something? Find out more about the slow food movement and collaborate with your local community and perhaps, start food appreciation at home instead of external food establishments.

I’ll be interested to find answers to these questions in Malaysia. Please share if you have them.

1) What are the laws which are protecting consumers and which ones are protecting the food industry and what is the balance?

2) What are we importing and exporting and why are we exporting better goods offshore instead of providing it to local consumers?

3) What agricultural practices are we implementing that take a holistic approach from ensuring farmer’s wellbeing up to consumer consumption education? For example, the UTZ Certified coffee beans in New Zealand that strongly practice sustainability in their coffee, tea and cocoa production supporting local communities.

4) Exactly how sustainable are we? In all our food productions; fisheries, agriculture, etc? And how many graduates are we churning out per year who do not just take over their seniors but to one day, lead and innovate these important but most overlooked industries?

On a separate note, read about this new spot in Manhattan called Rouge Tomato. It’s another one of those posh places where dining is fine art I supposed. But what’s commendable is, it too, is riding the wave of social-consciousness that’s sweeping across America hence providing an alternative to high-end customers. To wine and dine at their place, simply because RT belives in Grass-Fed New York Strip Steak (mind you, not CORN-fed. If you watch the movie, you’ll understand what I mean). Here's a peak:

2 comments:

*jonn* said...

Interesting topic. Surely Malaysia has stringent food regulations, the only question that needs answering is whether it is enforced. That's the bigger question at hand rather than lip service about practices (No flame intended).

I find in Malaysia the consumer is not always right, or heard. Whether you curb your spending on a particular product (Voting per se) will not deter others from buying it. This is attributed to the fact that reaching our populace in 3 different languages, among the myriad of household incomes, is a problem.

Imagine a rich person spotting a poor person buying the same item the rich person is about to buy. The rich person immediately puts the item aside in favor of a more expensive version which could be inferior, all because more expensive means better. In Malaysia i find this attitude to be more prevalent.

Ah the mysteries of the social dichotomy.

Off tangent a bit but, too often those of privilege will settle for the shiny packaging as opposed to proven results. This is because as advertisers we have succeeded in building an image of a product that may or may not be great for consumption. Example - Ribena, proven by two high school kids in New Zealand to deliver way less Vitamin C then claimed.

It reflects badly on us as a whole, as we aren't concerned enough about what we consume.

Perhaps our book smarts don't provoke enough freedom of questioning for us as a nation to care? Who knows...

Good enough cliffhanger? I think so ;)

/rant

sparks said...

Well, I think it's hard to expect everyone to change in the same way, and at the same pace.

I have to agree that enforcement is a serious problem in Malaysia. Everything propagated is either not practised by the loud mouths or not enforced. But see, I think this is where the age of information technology comes in. To empower people. If the rich person still chooses a more expensive product over responsible brands, then... I guess he or she hasn't been that enlightened at all. It takes time, but I think it's worth the fight.