"If everyone who could perform a job remotely did so just 1.6 days per week, $4.5 billion worth of fuel would be spared. That would prevent the release of 26 billion pounds of carbon dioxide each year, according to the Environmental Protection Agency."
Original posting at here.
It does sound a little extreme. Before MDs and CEOs start jumping like they're on frying pans, maybe we can tone it down a little. For those who can work remotely, for heaven's sake, WORK remotely. Perhaps we're all stuck in this little system where within the workforce, if one person or a team of people are not there physically, the output becomes inefficient. Is it true? Or is that an urban work myth? What's the point of having all these fancy multi-sharing tools and softwares if we're not able to work remotely anyway?
Something to think about.
Wednesday, August 13, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment